<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Amy&apos;s Robot</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://amysrobot.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:,2010:/1</id>
   <updated>2010-03-10T16:45:32Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.35</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Lost surprises</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/03/lost_surprises.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3928</id>
   
   <published>2010-03-10T15:22:04Z</published>
   <updated>2010-03-10T16:45:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I don&apos;t know which was the bigger surprise on last night&apos;s &quot;Lost&quot;: finding out who Ben is talking to on his doorstep, or seeing the &quot;Directed by Mario Van Peebles&quot; credit that flashed up on the screen at the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Celebrities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="TV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/lost_vanpeebles.JPG" alt="Mario Van Peebles directing Lost" /></p>

I don't know which was the bigger surprise on last night's "Lost": finding out who Ben is talking to on his doorstep, or seeing the "Directed by Mario Van Peebles" credit that flashed up on the screen at the same time (full episode <a href="http://abc.go.com/watch/lost/93372/253508/dr-linus?cid=fullepisodeaccess">here</a>).

The last I'd heard of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005522/">Mario</a>, he was directing and starring in a homage to his father Melvin's seminal 1971 blaxploitation movie <cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweet_Sweetback%27s_Baadasssss_Song">Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song</a></cite>, called, naturally <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367790/">Baadasssss!</a></cite> It was, and I mean this with all sincerity, badass.

Since then, he's directed a few episodes of "Law &amp; Order" and now has a small role on "Damages".  I don't think he's really made a movie since <em>Baadasssss!</em> (that's 5 s's) in 2003, but he has somehow gotten to direct three feature-length movies that are in production right now, including: <ul><li>a movie about spiritual redemption with Michael Clarke Duncan and the always skeezy Tom Skerritt called <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1470020/">Black, White and Blues</a></cite>,</li> <li>an insane-looking Russian produced movie about secret missions in Iraq with Bill Pullman and a guy from <em>Twilight</em> called <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234676/">Kerosene Cowboys</a></cite>,</li> <li>and one about a young football player called <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1606390/">Things Fall Apart</a></cite>, written by and starring 50 Cent, though seemingly not related to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Things_Fall_Apart_%28album%29">Roots album</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Things_Fall_Apart">novel by Chinua Achebe</a>, or the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Second_Coming_%28poem%29">poem by Yeats</a>.</li></ul>

Plus a BET documentary about black male role models called <a href="http://www.21cf.org/agame/film.php">"Bring Your A Game"</a> with Spike Lee and Ice Cube.  And an episode of "Lost".  

Mario Van Peebles, I don't know how you do it.  Either he's got the world's best agent, he works really cheap, or the entertainment industry thinks back on <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102526/">New Jack City</a></cite> with overpowering fondness.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title><![CDATA[Oscars night, with special Who'dat?&trade;: Oscars flashback edition]]></title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/03/whodat_oscars_flashback_editio.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3927</id>
   
   <published>2010-03-08T15:38:34Z</published>
   <updated>2010-03-08T17:53:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary> What I can&apos;t figure out about the Oscars is how a show that moves along from award to award so briskly and cuts off speeches at 45 seconds still feels like an interminable bore, punctuated by some funny Baldwin/Martin...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Celebrities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Who&apos;Dat?" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Women" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/bigelow_oscars.JPG" alt="Kathryn Bigelow winning Best Director Oscar" /></p>

What I can't figure out about the Oscars is how a show that moves along from award to award so briskly and cuts off speeches at 45 seconds still feels like an interminable bore, punctuated by some funny Baldwin/Martin banter. There were a mere 3 montages, no performances of Best Song nominees, and there wasn't even an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_G._Thalberg_Memorial_Award">Irving G. Thalberg award</a> this year!  

Still, when we got to the last two awards and the show was already a half-hour overtime, suddenly it went from slow-motion to high gear and it was all over in about 3 minutes.  <em>Hurt Locker</em>'s in, <em>Avatar</em>'s out, and Kathryn Bigelow gave two sincere but sort of bland speeches, thanking the military twice (and also Hazmat teams! Weird.)  I'd like to think that she won Best Director on the basis of her movie and not because of some feel-good self-congratulatory tokenism on the part of the Academy, but either way, she accepted it like a cool, collected pro (and thankfully avoided all <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/1892016.stm">"this award is so much bigger than me"</a> claims, and crying.)  Here's the <a href="http://oscar.go.com/video/index?playlistId=253172&clipId=253248">clip</a>.

Anyway, the other interesting moment was the teen star reunion in honor of John Hughes.  Look at the round-spectacled guy who looks sort of like one third of John Goodman with a goatee. Even after the announcer read all their names as they came out on stage, I had no idea who this guy was. 

<p class="center"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yb768ld"><img src="/files/whodat_25.JPG" alt="Who'dat?" /></a></p>

You can make your guess and click on the photo to see if you're right.  Or you can just read <a href="http://wonkette.com/414089/judd-nelsons-goatee-wins-oscar-for-best-facial-rodent">Wonkette's first headline</a> this morning.

Though I certainly didn't know it, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000555/">Judd Nelson</a> has kept working steadily since the 80's, mostly small roles in movies I've never heard of.  And <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102526/">New Jack City</a></cite>.  Later this year, he'll star in a movie called <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1496798/">Mayor Cupcake</a></cite>, in which he plays the husband of a small-town baker played by fellow Hughes teen star <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000670/">Lea Thompson</a>.

The weirdest part of the night was the dance montage of the Best Score nominees, with guys in cardigans breakdancing to <em>The Hurt Locker</em>.  

My favorite moments: The <em>Hurt Locker</em> actors <a href="http://oscar.go.com/video/index?playlistId=253172">picking each other up and screaming</a> when they won Best Picture, <a href="http://oscar.go.com/video/index?playlistId=253172&clipId=253199">T Bone Burnett's sunglasses and suit</a>, the horror montage, and the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1098535759192">AmEx Members Project ad with Geoffrey Canada</a> talking about Harlem Children's Zone, which was more inspiring than just about any of the award-winning movie clips.

You can watch <a href="http://oscar.go.com/video/index?playlistId=253172">all the acceptance speeches</a> at the Oscars site.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Oscars predictions</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/03/oscars_predictions.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3926</id>
   
   <published>2010-03-03T19:11:20Z</published>
   <updated>2010-03-05T15:55:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary> It&apos;s another Oscars year where everybody already knows who&apos;s going to win a lot of the major awards. Some of these are great picks, and some we&apos;ll think about years from now and wonder how the Academy could have...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/christoph_waltz.jpg" alt="Christoph Waltz" /></p>

It's another Oscars year where everybody already knows who's going to win a lot of the major awards. Some of these are great picks, and some we'll think about years from now and wonder how the Academy could have made such weird choices that now make no sense (Sandra Bullock really needs an Oscar?)

We've gone through the <a href="http://oscar.go.com/nominations/nominees?cid=10_oscars_landingCallout_nominations">nominees</a> and make our predictions about who's going to get the award, like always. These are our guesses about who will win, not necessarily who should win. My grand unified theory about how these things get decided is that Academy members vote for their friends, and they love to feel good about themselves.

Put your own picks in the comments and display your nuanced understanding of how Hollywood insiders operate!  If you're going to keep score at home and not just swear futilely at Sean Penn and Miley Cyrus as they announce winners, here's a <a href="http://oscar.go.com/media/2010/pdf/OSCAR_BALLOT.pdf?cid=10_oscars_landingCallout_nominations">printable ballot</a> with all the nominees.

<strong>Best Actor</strong>
<em>Jeff Bridges in "Crazy Heart"</em> (Amy) Jeff Bridges is by far the best part of this movie--he's pretty much irresistible and everybody loves him. This is the Academy's feel-good award this year. Clooney already has an Oscar, and Colin Firth will hopefully be back another year. (Cushie) I think Jeremy Renner is the dark horse here, but Bridges will win.
George Clooney in "Up in the Air" 
Colin Firth in "A Single Man" 
Morgan Freeman in "Invictus"
Jeremy Renner in "The Hurt Locker" 

<strong>Best Supporting Actor </strong>
Matt Damon in "Invictus" 
Woody Harrelson in "The Messenger" 
Christopher Plummer in "The Last Station" 
Stanley Tucci in "The Lovely Bones" 
<em>Christoph Waltz in "Inglourious Basterds"</em> (Amy) He's the obvious choice, and deserves to win, but there are other great nominees in this category. Too bad Christopher Plummer got his first nomination ever (!) this year, since he has no chance of winning. I guess that's what Lifetime Achievement awards are for. (Cushie) Matt Damon is probably the other one with a chance here, because he did a good job with a hard accent, but I think this might be the Basterds' only award.
 
<strong>Best Actress</strong>
<em>Sandra Bullock in "The Blind Side"</em> (Amy) I want to believe Meryl Streep's going to get it.  Do you realize Streep has not won an Oscar since 1983? It's time for another one, but she's not going to get it. Sandra Bullock is the weakest nominee of an otherwise great category. (Cushie) I think this is Sandra Bullock's year, unfortunately.  I would prefer any of the other four.
Helen Mirren in "The Last Station" 
Carey Mulligan in "An Education" 
Gabourey Sidibe in "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire" 
Meryl Streep in "Julie & Julia"

<strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong>
Penelope Cruz in "Nine" 
Vera Farmiga in "Up in the Air" 
Maggie Gyllenhaal in "Crazy Heart" 
Anna Kendrick in "Up in the Air" 
<em>Mo'Nique in "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"</em> (Amy) There is no question. It's kind of a cardboard caricature of a role, but she did a great job with it. (Cushie) Vera Farmiga should get the "if I wasn't against Mo'Nique I would win" award. 

<strong>Best Animated Feature Film</strong> 
"Coraline" 
"Fantastic Mr. Fox" 
"The Princess and the Frog"
"The Secret of Kells" 
<em>"Up" </em> (Amy) I love this movie. (Cushie)

<strong>Art Direction</strong>
<em>"Avatar" </em>(Amy) This is the kind of category Avatar really deserves to win. Note it did not get a screenwriting nomination.  (Cushie) I am actually OK with Avatar winning this. 
"The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus" 
"Nine"
"Sherlock Holmes" 
"The Young Victoria" 

<strong>Cinematography</strong>
"Avatar" 
"Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" 
<em>"The Hurt Locker" </em>(Amy) The steady, unflinching camera was one of the best parts of the movie (Cushie)
"Inglourious Basterds" 
"The White Ribbon" 

<strong>Costume Design</strong>
"Bright Star"
"Coco before Chanel" 
"The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus" 
<em>"Nine" (Amy) </em>Can this award specifically be for Penelope Cruz's <a href="http://www.willcwhite.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/penelope-cruz-burlesque-nine-1.jpg">cardiac-arrest-inducing underwear costume</a> from her big dance number? It's more likely a more obvious period piece will win, I just can't tell which one.
<em>"The Young Victoria"</em> (Cushie). The Academy loves period costumes, and it has a few choices here.

<strong>Directing</strong>
"Avatar" 
<em>"The Hurt Locker" </em>(Amy) This is it! The Academy won't be able to resist Making Movie History. I'm psyched. And will retreat into scowling hatred for the whole world if James Cameron wins. (Cushie) Time for a Lady Director! 
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
"Up in the Air" 

<strong>Best Documentary </strong>
"Burma VJ"       
<em>"The Cove" </em>(Amy) I want Food, Inc. to win, but people seem to be into this one. Didn't concern for dolphins go out of vogue sometime in the early 90's, though?      
<em>"Food, Inc." </em>(Cushie) Every single Academy member only shops at Whole Foods and feeds their beautiful child only the best in organic baby food.
"The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers"
"Which Way Home"

<strong>Best Documentary Short </strong>
"China's Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province"
"The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner"
<em>"The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant"</em> (Amy) Hollywood wants to appear concerned about the struggles of regular Americans, right before going to Elton John's afterparty at the Sunset Tower. (Cushie) Although I would not be surprised if they chose the China movie.
"Music by Prudence"
"Rabbit à la Berlin"

<strong>Editing</strong>
"Avatar" 
"District 9"
<em>"The Hurt Locker" </em> (Amy)(Cushie)
"Inglourious Basterds" 
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire" 

<strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong> 
"Ajami"
"El Secreto de Sus Ojos" 
"The Milk of Sorrow"
"Un Proph&egrave;te"   
<em>"The White Ribbon"</em>(Amy) Maybe too dark? Well, none of these are exactly feel-good, so I'm going with the one that's gotten the most attention.(Cushie)

<strong>Makeup</strong>
"Il Divo"
<em>"Star Trek" </em>(Amy)
<em>"The Young Victoria" </em>(Cushie)

<strong>Original Score</strong>
<em>"Avatar" (Cushie).</em> Yuck. 
"Fantastic Mr. Fox"
"The Hurt Locker" 
"Sherlock Holmes"
<em>"Up" </em>(Amy)

<strong>Original Song</strong>
"Almost There" from "The Princess and the Frog" 
"Down in New Orleans" from "The Princess and the Frog"
"Loin de Paname" from "Paris 36"
"Take It All" from "Nine"
<em>"The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)" from "Crazy Heart" </em>(Amy) The songs from this movie still pop into my head all the time. (Cushie) This is actually a great song.

<strong>Best Picture</strong>
<em>"Avatar"</em> (Amy)  I guess? It will win because of its total industry domination, but not much else. 
"The Blind Side" 
"District 9"
"An Education" 
<em>"The Hurt Locker"</em> (Cushie) Please please please!
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
"A Serious Man"
"Up" 
"Up in the Air"

<strong>Best Animated Short</strong>
"French Roast"
"Granny O'Grimm's Sleeping Beauty"
"The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)"
"Logorama" 
<em>"A Matter of Loaf and Death"  by Nick Park </em>(Amy) Only because it's Nick Park. (Cushie)

<strong>Best Short Film</strong>
"The Door" 
"Instead of Abracadabra" 
"Kavi" 
<em>"Miracle Fish"</em> (Cushie) No idea. I like the name of this. 
<em>"The New Tenants" </em>(Amy)

<strong>Sound Editing</strong>
<em>"Avatar" </em>(Cushie)
"The Hurt Locker"
"Inglourious Basterds"
<em>"Star Trek"</em> (Amy)
"Up" 

<strong>Sound Mixing</strong>
<em>"Avatar" </em>(Cushie)
<em>"The Hurt Locker" </em>(Amy) Hedging my bets, here.
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Star Trek"
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"

<strong>Visual Effects</strong> 
<em>"Avatar" </em>(Amy) It really deserves this one. Watching this movie was a transporting experience. (Cushie)
"District 9"
"Star Trek"

<strong>Adapted Screenplay</strong>
"District 9" 
"An Education"
"In the Loop" 
"Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
<em>"Up in the Air"</em> (Amy) People like this screenplay, I guess.  I thought it was sloppy and non-credible, and I hope Nick Hornby gets it for An Education, but I don't think he will. (Cushie) I agree although I would love to see Hornby or Armando Iannucci.

<strong>Original Screenplay</strong>
<em>"The Hurt Locker" </em>(Cushie) Although I also think A Serious Man is a good contender.
<em>"Inglourious Basterds"</em> (Amy) Maybe he'll win this one again!  Another really strong category. I'd be happy if any of these win, except maybe The Messenger.
"The Messenger" 
"A Serious Man"  
"Up"
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Scorsese: Style, yes! Substance, who cares?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/03/scorsese_style_yes_substance_w.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3925</id>
   
   <published>2010-03-01T15:44:35Z</published>
   <updated>2010-03-01T19:35:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Sometimes, Martin Scorsese makes cinematic masterpieces that will be watched and remembered forever. And sometimes he makes overly long meandering movies that have their good points and look great, but run out of steam by the end. In the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Ads" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Celebrities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/shutter_scorsese.JPG" alt="Scorsese and Leo on the set of Shuttler Island" /></p>

Sometimes, Martin Scorsese makes cinematic masterpieces that will be watched and remembered forever.  And sometimes he makes overly long meandering movies that have their good points and look great, but run out of steam by the end.  In the first category you've got <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099685/">Goodfellas</a></cite> and <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081398/">Raging Bull</a></cite> and, probably, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407887/">The Departed</a></cite>.  In the second category you've got movies like <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112641/">Casino</a></cite>, where the best thing about the movie might be Robert DeNiro's suits.  

I forget sometimes that not every Scorsese movie is a winner, but watching <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1130884/">Shutter Island</a></cite> last night served as a great reminder.  "Oh, right," I thought.  "I'd almost forgotten about the 15 years I spent watching <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0217505/">Gangs of New York</a></cite>."

If you think about <em>Shutter Island</em> as a pulpy, melodramatic B-movie, it actually comes out OK.  The first third of the movie is tense and atmospheric, and the dark mysteries about the mental institution "foh the criminally in-SANE," as we've all heard Leo stress <a href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2009/08/in_case_you_havent_seen_the_sh.php">over and over in the trailer</a>, are creepy and interesting.  The movie loses steam in the last 45 minutes, and the payoff at the end is really unsatisfying, but there sure are some beautiful shots and gorgeous, color-drenched sets, and all kinds of lurid images of horror-movie carnage.  When the blood flows it's a rich cherry red, and Ben Kingsley's sitting room is all velvet upholstery you could do the breaststroke in and sparkling crystal whisky decanters.  And I'm gonna be honest: there are worse ways you could spend your time than watching Mark Ruffalo in a 50's suit and fedora, raising those eyebrows and looking gorgeously Ruffalicious.

Actually, considering his competition, you could argue that <em>Shutter Island</em> is the best of the movies adapted from Dennis Lehane novels.  The other ones are Clint Eastwood's <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0327056/">Mystic River</a></cite>, which was drab and flat except when it was shrill and hysterical, and <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0452623/">Gone Baby Gone</a></cite> by Ben Affleck (I know!), which was pretty good but dragged in the third act.  Actually, all of his adapted movies seem to start strong and then sputter to a ending that I stopped caring about half an hour ago.

At least Scorsese knows how to do style when the substance is lacking.  For an excellent example of this that's a lot more fun than <em>Shutter Island</em>, there's the <a href="http://www.scorsesefilmfreixenet.com/video_eng.htm">long-form commercial he did for Freixenet</a> a couple of years ago. It's set up like a documentary about Scorsese filming some newly discovered pages from a Hitchcock script, and he's really hilarious in it.

Yeah, he sure does lots of ads, but at least they're funny.  The AmEx ads (especially the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCQgBcn3F8A">one hour photo one</a>) and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_LOsUzekZ4">AT&T ad</a> that runs in movie theaters about shutting off your cellphone ("You don't even call him daddy. To you, he's Frank. That's how detached you are") are my favorites.  Scorsese sells out better than anyone.  
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Women in subs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/women_in_subs.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3924</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-24T22:38:35Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-25T04:18:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There&apos;s a brief little news item today announcing that the Pentagon has decided to allow women to work on Navy submarines, which I hadn&apos;t realized was something they couldn&apos;t do already. With all the attention Don&apos;t Ask Don&apos;t Tell has...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="TV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="War and Security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Women" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[There's a brief little news item today announcing that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/us/24brfs-BANONWOMENON_BRF.html?ref=us">Pentagon has decided to allow women to work on Navy submarines</a>, which I hadn't realized was something they couldn't do already.  With <a href="http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-keep/?scp=4&sq=don%27t%20ask%20don%27t%20tell&st=cse">all the attention Don't Ask Don't Tell has gotten</a> lately, I sometimes forget about the tons of military jobs that women still aren't allowed to do (though as the Times reported last summer, they're increasingly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/us/16women.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">doing those jobs anyway</a>.)

So now that men and women can serve together on submarines (party sub!) and considering that Don't Ask Don't Tell's days are numbered, I can imagine one glorious day when there are gay and straight men and women all crammed in together on a submarine. 

I'm pitching the sitcom!  It will be like "How I Met Your Mother" meets "Glee".  On a sub.  

<p class="center"><img src="/files/himym_glee_sub.JPG" alt="How I Met Your Mother and Glee on a Submarine" /></p>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Stuff My Shatner Says</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/stuff_my_shatner_says.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3923</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-22T15:21:41Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-23T17:43:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary> A few months ago we heard that the popular Twitter account &quot;Shit My Dad Says&quot; was being turned into both a book and a CBS sitcom. This site makes me laugh 100% of the times I read it, so...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Celebrities" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="TV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/shatner.JPG" alt="William Shatner" /></p>

A few months ago we heard that the popular Twitter account <a href="http://twitter.com/shitmydadsays">"Shit My Dad Says"</a> was being turned into both a book and a CBS sitcom.  This site makes me laugh 100% of the times I read it, so as happy as I was that it was doing so well, I was a little worried that the swears and the casually cantankerous, humanity-hating stuff that make it so funny wouldn't make it to TV, where the title would probably be softened to "Stuff My Dad Says".

But now, none of that matters. Because <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2010/02/stuff-my-dad-says-cbs-tv-pilot.html">the star of the show is going to be WILLIAM SHATNER</a>.

<p class="center"><img src="/files/shatner_horse.JPG" alt="William Shatner on a horse" /></p>

This is some deeply inspired casting.  If anyone can make a TV-ready version of Samuel Halpern as funny as the original, it's the Shat.

The site's author, Justin Halpern <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2010/02/stuff-my-dad-says-cbs-tv-pilot.html">says</a> that his dad's first choice for a star to play him on the show was James Earl Jones.  Justin says, "I was like, 'But you're white.' He was like, 'Well, we don't have to be! Who gives a [censored]? You asked me who I thought, and that's who I think.' "

James Earl Jones would add a certain gravity to lines like, "A mule kicked Uncle Bob once. Broke his ribs. He punched it in the face.. My point? You have an ingrown fucking toenail. Stop bitching." But in this case the producers know what they're talking about. 

As a side note, I guess one of these days Justin Halpern will probably be able to move out of his parents' house in San Diego, but hopefully the time he'll have to commit to his book and TV show won't detract from time spent listening to his dad's blunt, vulgar wisdom. Also: his dad went to medical school and used to lecture at Harvard, so Halperin says the show's tone can't be quite as "All in the Family" as it sounds like it could be.

Here's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f1CgJXkcUQ">Shatner singing "Bust a Move"</a> in a Priceline commercial from a few years ago, around the time that his strange version of cool started moving into uncharted, mythical territory.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Will we hate Duane Reade any less now that it&apos;s Walgreens?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/will_we_hate_duane_reade_any_l.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3922</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-17T18:36:32Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-18T13:18:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Today&apos;s news that Walgreens is buying Duane Reade for a billion dollars is sure to bring a lot of derision from a city of people forced to shop at Duane Reade, often on a daily basis, in spite of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="NYC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/dr_walgreens.JPG" alt="Duane Reade and Walgreens" /></p>

Today's news that <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2010/02/17/2010-02-17_another_new_york_city_sell_out_walgreen_co_buys_duane_reade_for_just_over_1_bill.html">Walgreens is buying Duane Reade</a> for a billion dollars is sure to bring a lot of derision from a city of people forced to shop at Duane Reade, often on a daily basis, in spite of high prices, poor service, ridiculously convoluted store layouts, and their recent totally inflammatory decision to stop stocking Seventh Generation toilet paper. 

But if Walgreens is going to be successful in its attempt to <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2010/02/17/2010-02-17_another_new_york_city_sell_out_walgreen_co_buys_duane_reade_for_just_over_1_bill.html">"harmonize"</a> the cultures of the two chains, it had better learn about the realities of urban retail real estate, an area in which Duane Reade is the uncontested champion.  Duane Reade is currently owned by a private equity firm who made the <a href="http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/duane_reade_the_luxury_pharmac.php">new logo</a> and presumably launched the lucrative <a href="http://www.duanereade.com/NewProducts.aspx">Delish&trade;</a> snack line in an effort to spruce up the stores, but I believe that the most important strength Duane Reade has is its ability to locate its stores with such expert precision that most New Yorkers are actually <em>physically unable</em> to not shop there.

A few years ago, New York magazine had a <a href="http://nymag.com/nymetro/shopping/features/11908/">surprisingly long and well-researched feature</a> about Duane Reade's ability to turn the ugliest, worst-designed hole in the wall into successful retail space. It all comes down to one thing: foot traffic.  Figure out where people walk on their routes to and from work, then put your store smack in the middle of it.  

Then you can charge whatever you want, staff no more than two registers regardless of how busy it is, and place the saline solution in the back corner of the basement level, and people will still shop there.  Let CVS have the nice expensive corner location with no aggravating second floor where the Cold-Eeze&trade; is.  If it's on the wrong side of the block, you won't shop there, because <a href="/archives/2005/06/new_yorkers_will_do_anything_t.php">New Yorkers will do anything to avoid crossing the street</a>.

One other area of concern: while <a href="http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/i-new-york/82409/drugstores-you-asked-for-it">85%</a> of Duane Reade locations sell beer, exactly <a href="http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/i-new-york/82409/drugstores-you-asked-for-it">zero</a> Walgreens stores do.  Clearly another core competency that Walgreens might learn from its new acquisition.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pizzacone: an abomination</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/pizzacone_an_abomination.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3921</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-16T20:19:47Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-16T23:36:15Z</updated>
   
   <summary> There have been some notices recently about a new restaurant about to open in midtown called K! Pizzacone, which sells cone-shaped pizza. The pizzacone has actually already arrived in the greater NY area, by way of Brazil. Over the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Food" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="NYC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Robot-on-the-Spot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/pizzacone.JPG" alt="Pizzacone" /></p>

There have been some notices recently about a new restaurant about to open in midtown called <a href="http://ny.eater.com/archives/2010/01/pizzacones.php">K! Pizzacone</a>, which sells cone-shaped pizza.  The pizzacone has actually <a href="http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2009/08/pizza_in_a_cone_spotted_in_que.html">already arrived</a> in the greater NY area, by way of <a href="http://www.conepizza.com.br/">Brazil</a>.  Over the weekend, I went to a place in Astoria called <a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/berry-lover-new-york">Berry Lover</a>, which sells frozen yogurt, gelato, and something called <a href="http://conepizzany.com/">Cone Pizza</a>. 

In case you're interested in food trends and wonder what it's like to eat pizza in cone form, let me just tell you this. The pizzacone is a horror.  

I'm not going to get too graphic here, but let me give you an idea.  The Berry Lover Margherita Cone Pizza involves a hand-shaped piece of dough that is molded into a cone shape via a sort of hand-operated drill press.  Then the cone is filled with a lot of shredded cheese and some sauce and placed in a <a href="http://conepizzany.com/ConePizzaNY/policy.asp?Sub=K">cone pizza oven</a>, a rotating rotisserie kind of machine that cooks the whole thing.  Then they serve it wrapped in a little cardboard sleeve, like takeout coffee.

And it's absolutely terrible.  The crust was crispy, but totally uniform and bland and way too similar to an actual ice cream cone.  It was filled with low-grade, flavorless mozzarella that oozed out all over everything when I bit into it, and the cheese was edged with some pink liquid that I guess was the sauce. It tasted like like a hard, non-sweet ice cream cone filled with artificial-tomato-flavored caulk.  It tasted nothing like pizza, or food.  

The really counter-intuitive thing is that, as inflexible as the Italians are about which specific ingredients are permitted in pizza by a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/09/dining/for-the-pizza-makers-of-naples-a-tempest-in-a-pie-dish.html?pagewanted=1">government-regulated pizza authority</a> (e.g. buffalo mozzarella) and which ingredients are not (e.g. pineapple), it was actually an Italian company that created the pizzacone (<a href="http://www.konopizza.com/">"KonoPizza"</a>).  

So much for high standards and allegiance to centuries of culinary tradition.  It's like finding out your grandmother's homemade cookies were Chips Ahoy. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>She&apos;s everyone&apos;s Sharona</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/shes_everyones_sharona.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3920</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-16T16:29:22Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-16T23:42:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Doug Fieger, singer and guitarist of The Knack, died over the weekend of lung cancer (here&apos;s his obituary.) But his teenage girlfriend from the 70s, Sharon Alperin, still looms large in pop music history as the subject of their...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/sharona.JPG" alt="Sharona Alperin" /></p>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Fieger">Doug Fieger</a>, singer and guitarist of The Knack, died over the weekend of lung cancer (here's his <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/arts/music/16fieger.html">obituary</a>.)  But his teenage girlfriend from the 70s, Sharon Alperin, still looms large in pop music history as the subject of their biggest hit "My Sharona", that classic tale of unrestrained sexual coercion. 

Fieger presumably built his entire career around that one song, which was #1 in the charts for 6 weeks in 1979 and has been the inspiration for many <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Sharona#Parodies.2C_samples_and_covers">parodies</a> and <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/our-sharona/">tributes</a> and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvhw-uAzbVc&feature=player_embedded">scene</a> from <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110950/">Reality Bites</a></cite> that ushered people my age into generational nostalgia, even though we were still in college when the movie came out.

Anyway, I'm glad to see that Sharona, that <a href="http://static.rateyourmusic.com/album_images/d6f55e1f7df3701a9db61a02a479a525/71497.jpg">braless teenage siren in a tank top</a>, has used her tangential celebrity to her own advantage: her real estate website URL is <a href="http://www.mysharona.com/">mysharona.com</a>, one third of the site's <a href="http://www.mysharona.com/experience.php">page on her experience</a> is about the song, and she was <a href="http://music-mix.ew.com/2010/02/15/doug-fieger-knack-sharon/">interviewed for Entertainment Weekly</a> about Fieger's death (she "spent the entire weekend" with his body. Ew.)  

If the entire universe is going to hear how a 26 year-old guy in a band pressured you into having sex with him when you were 17, you might as well spend the next 30 years cashing in.  Go, Sharona.

Note: The Knack's second biggest single, <a href="http://popup.lala.com/popup/576742253310182745">"Good Girls Don't"</a>, is also catchy as hell and has even more salacious <a href="http://www.metrolyrics.com/good-girls-dont-lyrics-the-knack.html">lyrics</a>--see the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Girls_Don%27t_%28song%29">Wikipedia notes</a> on the "clean" version.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Aspies are expressing their emotions, and they&apos;re pissed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/aspies_are_pissed.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3919</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-11T19:55:29Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-11T21:00:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary> With the announcement of the fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the industry standard for diagnosing mental problems, there&apos;s been talk that Asperger Syndrome will no longer be included as a separate diagnosis. The...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="NYC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/dariusmccollum.JPG" alt="Darius McCollum, train lover" /></p>

With the announcement of the fifth version of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders">Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</a>, the industry standard for diagnosing mental problems, there's been talk that <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100211/ap_on_he_me/us_med_asperger_s_diagnosis">Asperger Syndrome will no longer be included as a separate diagnosis</a>.  The disorder was first introduced in the current version of the DSM, which was released in 1994, but now a lot of psychiatrists think it's part of the larger spectrum of autism disorders, and should just be grouped in as a mild form of autism.

So a lot of people with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome">Asperger Syndrome</a>, or <a href="http://www.aspie.com/">"aspies"</a> as they sometimes refer to themselves, don't like this at all. Aspies don't have the same language problems as people with more severe autism, but tend to get into obsessive behaviors and have similar problems with social interaction. And they want to maintain their distinct identity.

One of the psychiatrists who supports the change in the new DSM, Dr. Mina Dulcan, says their reaction to the change is <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100211/ap_on_he_me/us_med_asperger_s_diagnosis">just a symptom of being an aspie</a>: "One of the characteristics of people with Asperger's is that they're very resistant to change." 

But wait: the reason people with Asperger's want there to be a separate disorder called "Asperger's" is that they have Asperger's? Dr. Dulcan is arguing that there's no rational reason why someone might want their disorder to have its own name and diagnosis; if they think that way, it's just because they're mentally disabled.  

She goes on to say that the change in the manual "makes scientific sense. I'm sorry if it hurts people's feelings."

Hm.  It doesn't sound like she's really sorry.  Sounds like she's being pretty insensitive, actually. Could it be that Dr. Dulcan is displaying lack of empathy for other people's feelings and incomprehension of emotional cues? Is Dr. Mina Dulcan herself <em>a secret, self-hating aspie?!</em> 

Whatever she is, she's not very good at making her case.

Here are two of my favorite stories about people with Asperger Syndrome, both involving the subway: there's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_McCollum">Darius McCollum</a> (in the photo above) who has been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/15/nyregion/15arrest.html">arrested dozens of times</a> for MTA-related crimes, usually impersonating an MTA employee or, a few times, stealing trains or buses.  There was a <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20030927155810/www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/1824_304/85882845/print.jhtml">great piece in Harper's</a> about him in 2002, and a play called <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/boy-steals-train-assembly-rooms-edinburgh-589053.html"><em>Boy Steals Train</em></a> based on his life came out in 2003. 

Then there's Francisco Hernandez, Jr., an 13 year-old boy with Asperger's who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/nyregion/24runaway.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">rode the subway for 11 days straight</a> last year. He got on the D train in Brooklyn to avoid getting yelled at by his mom for not doing his homework, and just kept riding. From the Times article:

<div class="update">He says he subsisted on the little he could afford at subway newsstands: potato chips, croissants, jelly rolls, neatly folding the wrappers and saving them in the backpack. He drank bottled water. He used the bathroom in the Stillwell Avenue station in Coney Island.  Otherwise, he says, he slipped into a kind of stupor, sleeping much of the time, his head on his book bag. "At some point I just stopped feeling anything," he recalled. </div>
<br>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Hands off the eggplant!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/hands_off_the_eggplant.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3918</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-09T18:42:39Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-09T19:39:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary> In an impressive display of grassroots politics, legions of passionate Indian food activists successfully prevented genetically-modified eggplant from contaminating countless delicious servings of baingan bhartha. I&apos;m a big eggplant fan, too (a friend once observed that if any given...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Food" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="International" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/bt_brinjal.JPG" alt="Bt Brinjal eggplant protesters" /></p>

In an impressive display of grassroots politics, legions of passionate Indian food activists <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100209/ap_on_bi_ge/as_india_gm_food">successfully prevented</a> genetically-modified eggplant from contaminating countless delicious servings of <a href="http://cooks-hideout.blogspot.com/2009/10/veganmofo-iii-day-13-baingan-bhartha.html">baingan bhartha</a>.  I'm a big eggplant fan, too (a friend once observed that if any given menu has a dish that involves an eggplant, that's the one I'll order) so I'm psyched.

An Indian seed company, <a href="http://www.mahyco.com/">Mahyco</a>, had developed the world's first pesticide-resistant eggplant seed called Bt Brinjal, though as you might guess, our old <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805">plant-patenting ghouls</a> over at Monsanto are also involved--they own 26% of the Indian seed company and the patented Frankeggplant gene came from them.  Earlier today, the Indian Environment Minister decided to keep his nation's eggplants engineering-free.

Anyway, the protests involved the usual <a href="http://beta.thehindu.com/multimedia/dynamic/00028/31IN_BRINJAL1_28709f.jpg">rallies</a> and <a href="http://urbanhomestead.org/journal/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/against-bt-brinjal.jpg">street marches</a>, with many opportunities to dress up like giant eggplants.

<p class="center"><img src="/files/eggplant_protest.JPG" alt="Bt Brinjal protesters" /></p>

To remind everyone what they were fighting for, Greenpeace organized a <a href="http://greenpeace.in/safefood/the-biggest-baingan-bharta-ever/?src=gp">World's Biggest Baingan Bhartha campaign</a>, making the tasty roasted dish with one eggplant for every signature they collected--so far they're at <a href="http://www.vamban.com/protesting-bt-brinjal-with-biggest-baingan-bhartha/">20,000 eggplants</a>.  That's my kind of politics.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Band reunion</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/band_reunion.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3917</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-08T20:56:02Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-09T15:40:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Here&apos;s a great SNL sketch from this weekend&apos;s show, for everyone who&apos;s realized with dawning horror that the guys from the Dead Kennedys, Black Flag, and the Circle Jerks are all well into their 50s now. Band Reunion, with Crisis...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="TV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[Here's a great <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/126479/saturday-night-live-band-reunion-at-the-wedding#s-p2-sr-i1">SNL sketch</a> from this weekend's show, for everyone who's realized with dawning horror that the guys from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Kennedys">Dead Kennedys</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Flag_%28band%29">Black Flag</a>, and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_jerks">Circle Jerks</a> are all well into their 50s now. 

Band Reunion, with Crisis of Conformity:

<p class="center"><object width="358" height="207"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/YVEFp4lescx3IOWrHFyHJw"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/YVEFp4lescx3IOWrHFyHJw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="358" height="207"></embed></object></p>

You hear that, Alexander Haig?

Also, did you know <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Armisen">Fred Armisen</a> was the drummer for freaky 90s punk/hardcore/funk band <a href="http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:jifpxqqhldje~T0">Trenchmouth</a>?  I guess as SNL's oldest member and only legitimate aging rocker he's mentally preparing himself for his inevitable fist fight in the parking lot future.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Watch the game, hate your life</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/watch_the_game_hate_your_life.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3916</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-08T18:43:53Z</published>
   <updated>2010-03-01T16:51:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I noticed a theme in some of last night&apos;s Super Bowl ads: in addition to the usual inscrutably unfunny Doritos ads and unoriginal but instantly recognizable Go Daddy ads (those people really understand brand consistency) there was an undercurrent...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Ads" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Gender" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Sports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/flotv_ad.JPG" alt="FloTV Super Bowl ad" /></p>

I noticed a theme in some of last night's <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone">Super Bowl ads</a>: in addition to the usual inscrutably unfunny Doritos ads and unoriginal but instantly recognizable Go Daddy ads (those people really understand brand consistency) there was an undercurrent of male misery.  It's standard for ads to make the viewer feel uncomfortable or insecure, then offer the product as a solution to your self-esteem problem, but a couple of these ads suggested that the problem in your life is not really your athlete's foot--it's your girlfriend.

The <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032682">Dodge ad</a> was an especially bitter girl-hating ad, which is odd, considering that it's basically one long whiny bitch fest (with a few pissy little jokes thrown in.) It features lots of guys looking directly into the camera, with a voiceover listing all the indignities they suffer as part of living with a woman, such as being forced to separate the recycling.  Life for a man, according to this ad, is an endless series of irritations piled on by that bitch you married (or who's pressuring you for a ring, probably) and the only recourse is to drive a Dodge, the one thing in this world she can't take away from you.  

Geez, guys, if it's really that horrific to pick up your underwear, you could find a lady with less stringent household tidiness expectations.  Or support Chrysler by suffering in silence and driving a shitbox car.

Then there's the <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032678">poor doofus</a> who let his girlfriend drag him along underwear shopping (above) instead of letting him watch basketball.  Another hapless fellow whose simple yearning for happiness has been denied by his selfish cow girlfriend who needs a new bra.  Poor, poor widdle man!

The long-suffering man ad that I did like was the one for <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032716">Dove Men</a>, which is admittedly an absurdly tough product to try to sell during the Super Bowl.  Anyway, the Dove Men approach is to depict one man's life, from fetus to adulthood, and the many challenges he has faced and overcome along the way.  Living with a lady in this ad can also be a trial, but these difficulties are shown as small victories to be proud of rather than opportunities to complain about how much women suck.  And it's funny. A decent ad.

Actually, the Dove Men ad is probably targeted exclusively to women.  How many guys out there are going to purchase Dove Men bodywash at the supermarket?  They could at least rebrand this line to something like Falcon or, to continue the political metaphor, Hawk.  This ad probably presents a less toxically bitter attitude toward women because they're the buyers.  (Though I see that Dove got last night's MVP Drew Brees to appear on the <a href="http://dove.us/mencare/Default.aspx">website</a>, lathering up a very masculine and non-drying foam in the shower.) 

My favorites were the <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032738">Kia ad</a> about toys going out on the town (particularly the shot of the robot and a human in a Vegas club, both doing the robot) and the <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone/watch#50032734">Audi ad</a> using Cheap Trick's "Dream Police" as a soundtrack for scenes of an army of draconian eco-fascists handcuffing people for using styrofoam cups.  I love it.

You can watch all the ads on <a href="http://www.hulu.com/adzone">Hulu</a>, though you have to watch a few seconds of a Coke ad before you watch each of the other ads, which seems unjustifiably cheap.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>No lollygagging for Terrence Malick</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/no_lollygagging_for_terrence_m.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3915</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-03T21:48:31Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-04T04:38:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Terrence Malick is not one to rush. During his unhurried 37 year career, he&apos;s written and directed exactly 5 movies. Sure, they&apos;ve been doozies (Badlands, The New World, and The Thin Red Line, which I haven&apos;t seen but I&apos;m...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/mallick.JPG" alt="Terrence Malick" /></p>

<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000517/">Terrence Malick</a> is not one to rush.  During his unhurried 37 year career, he's written and directed exactly 5 movies.  

Sure, they've been doozies (<cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069762/">Badlands</a></cite>, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402399/">The New World</a></cite>, and <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120863/">The Thin Red Line</a></cite>, which I haven't seen but I'm sure is good) but the man knows how to take his time.  He took 20 years to come out with his follow-up to 1978's <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077405/">Days of Heaven</a></cite>.

And technically, his fifth movie hasn't even come out yet.  <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478304/">The Tree of Life</a></cite> stars Brad Pitt, Sean Penn, Fiona Shaw, and Jessica Chastain, and it's about a 1950s Texas family (though there's allegedly a lot more to it than that: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tree_of_Life_%28film%29">something "hugely ambitious" involving prehistoric Earth</a> and possibly <a href="http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/03/02/terrence-malicks-tree-of-life-has-imax-sized-dinosaurs/">dinosaurs</a>. Who knows.) It's coming out later this year, a short 5 years after <em>The New World</em>.

Now today there are <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/02/03/terrence-malick-is-prepping-another-new-film-bale-bardem-mcadams-and-kurlenko-reportedly-cast/">reports</a> that later this year, he'll start shooting <em>another movie</em>.  That will presumably be released in <em>the same decade</em> as his last movie.  Well! Look out, world!  Hurricane Terrence is rolling down the pike, and he ain't paying no tolls!      

This new movie will star <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000288/">Christian Bale</a> (who was also in <em>The New World</em>), <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000849/">Javier Bardem</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1046097/">Rachel McAdams</a>, and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1385871/">Olga Kurylenko</a> (the most recent Bond girl) in some kind of dramatic love story.  Judging from his other dramatic love stories, it will probably end badly.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Look at all those best picture nominations</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2010/02/best_picture_nomiantions.php" />
   <id>tag:amysrobot.com,2010://1.3914</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-02T16:39:38Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-04T04:20:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The Oscar nominations are out. I had big hopes that this year&apos;s change from 5 to 10 best picture nominations would allow some smaller movies that don&apos;t normally stand a chance to be acknowledged, and in some cases this...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://amysrobot.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p class="center"><img src="/files/blindside.JPG" alt="The Blind Side" /></p>

The <a href="http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/oscar-nominations/">Oscar nominations</a> are out.  I had big hopes that this year's change from 5 to 10 best picture nominations would allow some smaller movies that don't normally stand a chance to be acknowledged, and in some cases this has happened.  None of the movies I named <a href="http://amysrobot.com/archives/2009/06/double_down_oscars.php">back in June</a> when the change was announced actually ended up with nominations (<cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/">Moon</a></cite>, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1091722/">Adventureland</a></cite>, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1095442/">Goodbye Solo</a></cite>) but <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1019452/">A Serious Man</a></cite>, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/">District 9</a></cite>, and <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/">Up</a></cite> probably wouldn't have made the list otherwise.  

I usually try to see all the Best Picture nominees before the Oscars, but my primary movie-watching partner wrote to me this morning saying, "Jesus Christ, are we gonna have to watch <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0878804/">The Blind Side</a></cite> now??" I think I'm OK with letting this one go.

I guess that's what you get with a longer nominations list. I'd like to think <em>The Blind Side</em> would never have made a list of 5, and I still sort of can't believe it beat out <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1119646/">The Hangover</a></cite>.  The weekend it came out, I happened to be at our nation's largest retirement community, <a href="http://www.thevillages.com/">The Villages</a>, and, gee whiz, did old white people sure get excited about that movie.  Maybe this nomination is the Academy trying to reach out to middle America and show them they love feel-good star vehicles, too (especially the ones whose moral seems to be, in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/movies/22scott.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">the words of A.O. Scott</a>, that "the best hope for a poor black child in America is to have rich white parents.") And the people who produce the Oscars are <a href="http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/blind-side-forever/">psyched</a> that so many huge hits are in the mix this year.

It's looking like <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/">Avatar</a></cite> is going to get Best Picture, in spite of everything.  I'm still chasing the dream that Kathryn Bigelow will get Best Director for <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/">The Hurt Locker</a></cite>, since every so often the movie that win Best Picture doesn't also win directing or acting awards.  All the recent movies I can think of that fall into this category have been big, bombastic movies that are, arguably, sort of terrible and don't hold up to much scrutiny: <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0172495/">Gladiator</a></cite>, <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299658/">Chicago</a></cite>, and <cite><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375679/">Crash</a></cite> won Best Picture but not Best Director, and of those three I think only <em>Gladiator</em> won a major acting award.  <em>Avatar</em> could join that list: it got nominations for best picture and director, but, notably, no acting or writing nominations, probably because the acting and writing are mostly awful.  So there's some justice.

Right now I'm going to say Jeff Bridges and Sandra Bullock (I know, I don't understand it either) will get the acting awards, <em>Avatar</em> gets Best Picture, and Kathryn Bigelow gets Director. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
